25.4.2019- The Law Firm “Spilios Spiliopoulos and Partners” represents ERGOTRAK before the Athens Administrative Court of Appeal, for the purpose of drafting and filing an additional intervention, in the context of an application for annulment under the Law on Public Procurement. 4412\/2016 (Law on Public Procurement of Works, Supplies and Services), filed before the above Court, which is directed against the Authority for the Examination of Preliminary Objections (AEPP) and the Municipality of Athens.
\nIn particular, in the context of a tendering procedure for the supply of tankers, the competent committee of the Municipality of Athens, in its decision, accepted, from a technical point of view, the tender submitted by the company Ergotrak. A competing company appealed against the decision of the Municipality of Athens before the Authority for the Examination of Preliminary Objections (AEPP), requesting the annulment of the decision. The company ERGOTRAK appealed against the appeal and in favour of the decision of the Municipality of Athens, with an additional intervention which was prepared and filed by our office. The AEPP with its decision No. 941\/2018, accepted the intervention of ERGOTRAK and rejected the preliminary appeal of the other competing company.
\nAgainst the decision of AEPP and the Municipality of Athens, the losing bidder company filed a request for suspension and a request for annulment before the Athens Administrative Court of Appeal, against which ERGOTRAK appealed, making an additional intervention. It is noted that the application for suspension has already been rejected by the Administrative Court of Appeal, accepting the additional intervention, pursuant to its decision No. 485\/2018, while the decision on the application for annulment is expected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
25.4.2019- The Law Firm “Spilios Spiliopoulos and Partners” represents ERGOTRAK before the Athens Administrative Court of Appeal, for the purpose of drafting and filing an additional intervention, in the context of an application for annulment under the Law on Public Procurement. 4412\/2016 (Law on Public Procurement of Works, Supplies and Services), filed before the above Court, which is directed against the Authority for the Examination of Preliminary Objections (AEPP) and the Municipality of Athens.
\nIn particular, in the context of a tendering procedure for the supply of tankers, the competent committee of the Municipality of Athens, in its decision, accepted, from a technical point of view, the tender submitted by the company Ergotrak. A competing company appealed against the decision of the Municipality of Athens before the Authority for the Examination of Preliminary Objections (AEPP), requesting the annulment of the decision. The company ERGOTRAK appealed against the appeal and in favour of the decision of the Municipality of Athens, with an additional intervention which was prepared and filed by our office. The AEPP with its decision No. 941\/2018, accepted the intervention of ERGOTRAK and rejected the preliminary appeal of the other competing company.
\nAgainst the decision of AEPP and the Municipality of Athens, the losing bidder company filed a request for suspension and a request for annulment before the Athens Administrative Court of Appeal, against which ERGOTRAK appealed, making an additional intervention. It is noted that the application for suspension has already been rejected by the Administrative Court of Appeal, accepting the additional intervention, pursuant to its decision No. 485\/2018, while the decision on the application for annulment is expected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pgc_meta":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[525],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cases"],"rttpg_featured_image_url":null,"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"spiliopouloslaw","author_link":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/author\/root2christos\/"},"rttpg_comment":0,"rttpg_category":"CASES<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"25.4.2019- The Law Firm \"Spilios Spiliopoulos and Partners\" represents ERGOTRAK before the Athens Administrative Court of Appeal, for the purpose of drafting and filing an additional intervention, in the context of an application for annulment under the Law on Public Procurement. 4412\/2016 (Law on Public Procurement of Works, Supplies and Services), filed before the above…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5738"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5738\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spiliopouloslaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}